|
| Recent
Articles |
Commercial & Open Source Still Not Antonyms
Over the last few days I have just been reading my news alerts on commercial open source and I found out that someone still thinks it sounds like a contradiction in terms, others question about how open commercial...
5 Free SEO Tools For Web Developers And Marketing...
There are a lot of tools out there for web developers and marketers that do all kinds of different things. It is hard to know what is important and what isn't important when you are using some of the tools available. When it comes down to it, the best way to get search traffic is...
Sun Controlled FOSS Communities Grant
Simon (Chief OSS Officer at Sun) talks about Sun's $1 million dollar grant to Sun controlled FOSS communities.Net/net: Sun will take $1M and divide it amongst six Sun owned/controlled FOSS communities.
When Is It Application Development?
An interesting post caught my eye recently - Should we still call it Application Development? This seems like an interesting question, particularly when you start considering the decomposition of the application...
|
|
01.23.08
Generalizations About Software
 By Savio Rodrigues
A reader commented that MySQL isn't "enterprise ready", to which another reader wrote:
"I hate it when snobby DBAs or managers scoff at MySQL as if it isn't ready to play with the big boys. Google called, they'd like to loan you a clue."
Valid point. But, I'm fairly certain that Google engineers could
run a highly scalable computing system (whatever that is) using nothing more than OS/2, a paper clip, duct tape and maple
syrup.
I am not bashing MySQL in any way (I'm a happy user).
I am however suggesting that the skills level inside an average IT shop are different than skills you'll find at Google.
And yet, we all use things that Google, Amazon, etc. are doing as 'proof' that other customers should follow suit.
In many cases it's valid advice that ignores two things: the skills and legacy code/apps/infrastructure at the company.
Many developers have deep skills with alternative products, and for better or worse, are more productive with said products than a new OSS product. (Somewhat related…I'm always surprised that EnterpriseDB hasn't been more successful vs. Oracle, considering EnterpriseDB's goal to ensure compatibility with Oracle.)
The Google's of the world didn't have 'legacy' to deal with in their Greenfield environments.
The overwhelmingly majority of customers aren't as fortunate. So, maybe the legacy 'stuff' running ends up being more important (from a CYA standpoint) than taking a risk by deploying 'something new'?
And hey, let's not kid ourselves into thinking that customers, in their ever ending bid to cut costs, are happily paying enterprise software license fees without receiving value from these
products.
Comments
About the Author:
Savio Rodrigues is a product manager with IBM's WebSphere Software division. He envisions a day when open source and traditional software live in harmony. This site contains Savio's personal views. IBM does not necessarily agree with the views expressed here.
|
